Balance

Mike MacLean

My wife is nine months pregnant, due to give birth any day now.  While we have the usual doubts about parenting, we’re excited and happy for this new chapter in our life.

I have only one real fear.  What will happen to my writing?

As it is, my time is spread thin.  Between the day job, my martial arts studies, quality time with the wife, and the blog, my fiction sometimes gets pushed to the side.  And now, there’s going to be a little one in my life-a beautiful, crying, crapping, burping little one.  Just one more demand on my time.

I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t concerned.  After all, writing doesn’t pay the bills right now.  Writing isn’t going to change a diaper.  Writing isn’t going to hug my wife.

So where does writing fit in the grand scheme of things?  How important is it?

I remember a 60 Minutes interview with a famous playwright whose name now escapes me.  When asked about the balancing act between his family and his work, the playwright responded, "Art comes first… Always."

While I don’t agree, I understand the sentiment.  To give up on writing, would be giving up on a dream.  Losing hold of it would mean losing a piece of myself.  That’s a short road to bitterness.

How good a husband will I be if I’m unhappy?  How good a father?

Putting writing aside simply isn’t an option.  In fact, I feel more and more that I must make it a priority.  The question becomes, where do I find the time?

So I’m reaching out to you once again murder fans.  To the writers out there, especially those with day jobs, how do you keep the balance?  How do you keep writing a priority when life gets in the way?

Happy Easter and enjoy the ham.

Mike MacLean

Masters of the Craft (World Horror, Part II)

by Alex

Writing conventions are always invaluable on so many levels it’s hard to quantify.  But there’s often, or maybe always, one particular thing that happens that is worth the whole cost and effort of attending – that may actually cause a paradigm shift in the way you approach your writing and/or your career.

I was at the World Horror Convention in Toronto last weekend and for me that life-altering event was the “Masters of the Craft” panel, with F. Paul Wilson, Ramsey Campbell, Gahan Wilson, Joe Lansdale, Robert Sawyer and David Morrell.

It’s always wonderful to see Paul, Ramsey, and David, who have not just been inspirations, but also extremely generous and supportive mentors (and in the case of Paul and David, bandmates…)   But the combination of these author/artists in conversation together was truly transcendent.

It’s possibly impossible to distill a panel like that into anything useful for people who weren’t actually there, but I’m going to try to pass on the highlights anyway because I was so struck by the synergy of what these guys were saying about what it takes to make the kind of lasting career they all have.

Artist of the Macabre Gahan Wilson was so charming and funny and earnest when he went off on this rant: “When you start you have to have a mad conviction that you’re going to succeed.   It has nothing to do with logic because the chance of succeeding in any art is hopeless.   And you have to love it, be absolutely crazy about it.  Don’t do it unless you’re nuts.”

Lansdale seconded him (and you must imagine this in a thick West Texas drawl):  “You’ve got to be obsessed with it at first.   It’s like being in love – at first you never get out of bed – but after a few years you find you’re able to do a few basic other things, like take out the garbage once in a while.”

(I think all of us who have been published, or are about to be, know this.  In fact we’re so obsessed we don’t really notice how obsessed we are, and when you finally get to a point that you can lift your head up and look back on what you did to get where you are you’re pretty stunned at how insane it all seems.   Thank God we don’t seem to notice when we’re actually doing it, and thank God we don’t realize how long it’s going to take when we start out, or I don’t think there would be any books published, ever.)

Then there was this:

“Writing is like a parasite.   It never quits.    It’s wearing.   The wires are always firing and you don’t get to rest like other people.”
— Joe Lansdale

I can’t tell you how good it feels to hear that from people.   I never tire of hearing it.   It makes me feel not so completely freakish.   Or maybe I’m just clinging to that thought in order to justify acting like a completely insane person.

Gahan Wilson had another reason for never allowing himself to turn  off:

“Some nights you wake up all of a sudden and God is in the room and telling you what your story needs and you better write it down,  or God will get pissed and go away.”

The panel spent a lot of time talking about what makes a breakout success.   Joe Lansdale said:   “It’s about voice and capturing what real human beings think about.   I’ve read all the clever stories and can pretty much guess an entire story from the first chapter, so what keeps me reading is the voice, the style.”     He went on to say that Stephen King was the first author he read who wrote in the voice of their (Joe’s and King’s) generation – the voice of the Sixties, with all the asides and a particular kind of stream of consciousness and incorporating so many references to music and popular culture.   I’d never heard it put exactly that way before, but it made absolute and total sense.

Paul Wilson agreed, but added there was also a certain element of luck involved.   “The right story at the right time will hit in a way that can make a career for life.” He referenced his own THE KEEP as an unpredictable success that made his career.

All the authors talked about how unnerving it was to them that so many people they started out with at the same level of writing just dropped off along the way.   Lansdale said,  “This is not a romantic profession.  It’s more like boxing.  You get knocked down and what keeps you in the game is that you keep getting back up.”

David Morrell warned,   “Don’t chase the market.   It will never work.   It’s better to be a first rate version of yourself than a second rate version of anyone else."

And Paul Wilson said the most important thing is – “You have to write what you love to read.”  

The darkest moment of the panel for me was when Ramsey Campbell and Joe Lansdale both said bluntly – “No wife, no career.”   Obviously that’s not going to happen, so I’m ignoring it.

But the most important moment of the panel for me was when the authors were talking about genre, and crossing genres, and Joe Lansdale swept all of that aside impatiently and said:

“Real authors create their own genre.   Stephen King is his own genre.   You have to throw out your conceptions of genre and develop a voice and an honesty about the human condition that becomes its own genre.”

Now THAT – is a career-defining concept. 

I’m a genre author and a cross-genre author but I do think it’s true – that my favorite authors, the authors I read over and over again –  King, Shirley Jackson, Paul Wilson,  Daphne Du Maurier, Ira Levin, Anne Rice, the Brontes… really are genres unto themselves.     And this may be one of Gahan Wilson’s mad convictions that have nothing to do with logic, but I believe that (maybe through sheer stubbornness or insanity) I have the possibility of doing that – of being my own genre.

After this weekend I am no longer spending any time thinking about what’s out there or what I’m writing compared to what other people are writing.   I’m just going to write it, whatever the hell IT is.

And now that I’ve had that epiphany I have to say I am exponentially thrilled that we have an author joining us here at Murderati who IS his own genre – the indefinable and incomparable Ken Bruen.   I don’t know if you’d call what he does Irish Noir, or even more specifically Galway Noir, or Benign Thuggery, or simply Bruenesque, but Ken has a style that is impossible to copy, because anyone but the original would immediately sound like a cheap imitation.    There’s just too much pure soul going on in what Ken does to make it copiable (if that’s a word).  If you haven’t read him, never mind commenting today, just run out and get THE GUARDS, to start, and you’ll see what I mean.

That Masters of the Craft panel at World Horror was a career-defining experience for me.   But I’m thinking there are going to be some career-defining experiences right here for more than just me, now that Ken is aboard.

I can’t wait.

One Year Later

JT Ellison

It’s hard to imagine that we’ve been blogging here at Murderati for a year. Thank you to all our readers!

I don’t usually make New Year’s resolutions, and I look at September, the beginning of the school year, as the beginning of my year. Now I have an anniversary in April to celebrate. Fitting, really, the rebirth of the season, new life, new hope. I looked back over my blog entries — 49 essays, 45 wine recommendations, and am struck by the amount of work. I’m very grateful for this forum. It has changed me, as a writer, a reader, a group member, a technorati, a leader and a follower. And any exercise that changes you for the better, as I believe Murderati has done for me, if well worth the hard work, don’t you think?

We’ve all had change in the past year. My life has altered so dramatically, I sometimes need a good pinching to remind myself that it’s real.

Allow me a moment to indulge in where I stood as an author this time last year. I had an agent and a book under my belt that hadn’t sold. I’d just written my first couple of short stories. The mere thought of writing a weekly essay on writing scared me to death. How could I expect anyone to take me seriously when I’d never been published, and was surrounded by all these great writers who had?  I knew virtually no one in the industry outside of a few generous souls who were encouraging me behind the scenes. I’d never even been to a conference when I agreed to come on board. I feel like Murderati took a huge chance on me, and I’ll be forever grateful for the opportunity.

I got my book deal 6 weeks after Murderati’s inception. Would I have gotten the deal if I weren’t with the blog???? I don’t know. Murderati didn’t hurt, I’ll tell you that.

It’s funny, really, when I look back over the past year. It hearkens back to my junior high days of glasses and braces, being much too tall for every boy, finding validation on the basketball court, the volleyball court and in class, but never feeling like I fit. Square peg, round hole. Then we moved, I lost the braces, got contacts, and enjoyed high school. I wasn’t the most popular girl, kind of drifted between all the groups, the jocks (I was a track hound — state discus) the brains (G&T classes) the druggies (LOVED Jethro Tull and Pink Floyd), the punks (desperately wanted to die the hair pink but didn’t have the guts, and Anarchy, Baby!) and the geeks (because really, aren’t we all?) I didn’t have a ton of trauma. It was fine.

But I never totally lost that square peg/round hole feeling. Even when I was happy in my other career, I knew something wasn’t right. When I found myself through my books, I finally understood where I was supposed to be in the grand scheme of life. Square pegs finds finely crafted square hole — or as hubby likes to put it — blind squirrel finds nut, News at 11. It is a bit of a "duh" feeling. I’ve never been so happy as I have this past year.

Murderati has given me a gift bigger than any I’ve ever received. As a few of you may have noticed, I tend to do a bit of introspection through this blog. This weekly analysis session is like lying on the psychiatrist’s couch for me. I get to examine my motivations, delve into the why behind my writing, and more importantly, adhere to a writing schedule. I’ve learned new levels of discipline. Days where the fiction isn’t flowing, I can write four or five blog entries and get myself back in the game. I have a new level of comfort with my own writing, and with the explanations therein. I thank you for allowing me to come into your life each week.

While I wish my blog mates past and present a big Happy Birthday, I leave you, the reader, with this thought. Follow your dreams. You just don’t know where they might lead.

xo,  JT

Wine of the Week: As I wrote this post, my absolute favorite Rachmaninoff, the Piano concerto #2, came on. So to honor the karma, let’s do something different.

And some location specific wine to go with it: Francis Ford Coppola Rosso The wine is divine, and the website a work of art.

Chaos Theory

I saw my author-friend, Tony Broadbent, not too long ago.  We hail from the same hometown back in the old country.  We got to chatting and he gave me a pat on the head and told me I was an anarchist. 

“You’re like the Gary Oldman of the mystery world,” he said.

I love Gary, but I asked, “Is that a good thing?”

“Yes,” he exclaimed.  “There’s a lot of anarchy in your writing.”

How subversive, I thought.  I’m a rebel without an agenda.  Mum will be delighted.

Well, the little exchange got me thinking about my writing.  I don’t think people hit the keyboards with an agenda or a theme tucked under their arm—or if they do, it sort of sticks out.  Agendas and themes develop on a subconscious level.  Well, they do for me.  I don’t go out of my way to put a slant on my stories.  I just try to entertain, but inadvertently, I show a little leg now and again.  So, I looked for the anarchy.  And I think I saw it in the shape of conflict.

Conflict.  Stories require conflict.  It’s a driving force.  Characters and stories thrive on it.  More so in mysteries and thrillers than other genres.  The nature of the genre means there are going to be casualties and collateral damage.  So I like to inject my stories with a lot of conflict.  The problem is that I’m quite a literal person and I think about things in very pure terms.  Blame my engineering background.  When I think conflict, I think about total annihilation.  Everything my lead character holds dear is under attack.  I create this person so that I can destroy them.  I place them and their world in an ivory tower, then go about stacking as much C4 explosive around the foundation as possible to blast it all apart.  It only seems fair, doesn’t it?  Conflict by its nature is salt to a wound.  Character assassination is key.  Only by putting everything in a protagonist’s world at extreme risk can the character grow and thrive.  There can’t be a comfort zone for this person.  Wouldn’t you want to read about a character in a situation like that?

I flicked through some of my stories to see what I did to my characters and the annihilation is there.  Characters have their reputations destroyed, home life obliterated, are framed for things for crimes they didn’t commit, have personal property confiscated or stolen or destroyed.  These characters’ lives will never be the same.  There will have to be a lot of rebuilding by the end.

So I guess I do have anarchistic bent.  Sorry.  It wasn’t intentional.  It’s just the way I tell ‘em.

Yours destructively,
Simon Wood
PS: Saturday I’m signing at San Francisco Mystery Bookstore.
PPS: Saturday also marks the 39th anniversary of Jim Clark’s death.  Jimmy is a personal hero of mine.  His name might not mean much to most readers, but Guyot will be shedding a tear.

Riding the Roller Coaster

by Robert Gregory Browne

Before I was lured away by the publishing industry, I spent two years of my so-called screenwriting career writing Saturday morning cartoons.  I proudly take my share of the blame for what many fans of Spider-Man consider the worst version of the webslinger ever committed to celluloid.  A show called Spider-Man Unlimited.

God knows, my writing partner, Larry Brody, and I never intended to write crap.  We did the best we could with the hand we were dealt.  Unfortunately, long before we became involved with the show, someone had decided it would be a good idea to take Peter Parker out of New York and put him in an alternate universe where talking animals tooled around on flying Vespas.

Although we never quite succeeded in turning lemons into lemonade, we did have our moments.  And I don’t cringe too badly when I see the show pop up on television once in awhile.

On a personal level, it was a great time in my life.  The work was steady – or at least as steady as it can get in Hollywood – and the pay was great.  Brody and I spent a lot of days grabbing lunch at Lupe’s in Thousand Oaks, then driving to his ranch as we discussed story and, more often, life. 

During one of those drives, Brody and I were talking about writers and writing, and something he said has stuck with me ever since:

“Nine times out of ten," he told me, "you find a guy who loves his own writing, the work will be mediocre at best.”

Now, at that moment in time, even though we were writing a crappy little cartoon show, I was putting my best effort into the project and thought I was pretty darn good at it.  I had always had a fairly healthy respect – if not outright love – for my own work.  Always thought I could get the job done and do it well.

But what Brody said gave me pause.  Was I one of those guys?  Was I stuck in the animation ghetto because my work was merely mediocre and not as good as I’d always thought it was?

What followed, of course, was the usual downward spiral into self-doubt that writers everywhere can relate to.  I was immediately reminded of the co-worker who,  many years before, had handed me the manuscript of his first mystery novel, proclaiming it to be a work of genius.

It was, in fact, incomprehensible. 

Yet this poor gentleman was convinced that he was the next Raymond Chandler.  Not a doubt in his mind.  And after I gave him a bit of constructive criticism, his reaction had me wondering if I’d escape his apartment with all of my limbs attached.

So, when Brody made his proclamation as we drove through the hills, I had to wonder if I was as deluded as my former co-worker had been. 

That’s all it took to send me crashing.  A simple statement – that may or may not have been true – by a friend I respected.   A simple statement that had me doubting my worth as a writer and a human being.

It never ceases to amaze me how easily we writers can fall into this kind of funk.  Our entire existence is based on our ability to create something that others will read and enjoy, and it takes very little to get us wondering if we’ve failed.  One minute we think we’re geniuses and the next we’re convinced our work truly, truly sucks.

The writing life is a roller coaster.   A roller coaster I thought I was riding alone until I started hanging out with other writers and quickly discovered that this particular amusement park ride is quite well-populated.  Probably over-populated.  And even  the most successful of us aren’t immune to motion sickness.

Just the other day I was reading the Afterword to one of Dean Koontz’s books and he had this to say:

"When I am writing a novel, I experience bleak spells of deep self-doubt about my work, moments of surging confidence, despair followed by joy — although there are usually more dark moments than bright."

That about sums it up.  And it’s heartening to know that even a writer with the kind of fan base most of us would kill for and riches we can only dream of, has the very same doubts the rest of us do.

The question is, why?  Why are writers plagued by this disease?  Why, despite our successes, do we allow these dark demons to possess us on a fairly regular basis?  Why do we analyze the simplest of statements, carefully examining them for proof that we don’t deserve to put pen to paper?

I suppose you could argue that if we didn’t have such doubts, our work would never grow and improve.  That we’re in a business that requires us to always be at the top of our game and self-satisfaction is the surest sign that we’re losing it.   

That could be true.  Or maybe, as someone recently suggested to me, we live in a world where people with big egos are frowned upon, so we regularly have to punish ourselves for allowing our heads to grow too large.

It’s all a mystery to me.  One that will take greater minds than mine to solve. 

Yet, despite my whining, despite the tone of this post, I’m not quite as miserable as I may sound.  The truth is, I’m not really like Koontz.  When I’m writing, I have many more bright moments than dark.   And I actually enjoy reading my own work when it’s fresh and new, or even when I go back years later and read the stuff I barely remember writing.

Loving our own work does not mean it’s mediocre.  There’s nothing wrong in having a healthy respect for the words and worlds we create.  We should give our bruised egos a break and celebrate our ability to do what we do.  Regularly and often.

Of course, there’s no telling how I’ll feel about all of this tomorrow….

Rob Gregory Browne

Irtnog

 By LouiseBlock_exclam_paren_16338

A couple of weeks ago, somebody on one of the chat lists suggested that since it was so expensive and so time consuming to try reading all the new books that were available, perhaps publishers should get together and agree to issue only 200 to 300 new books a year. "That way the authors will get the royalties they deserve and we have a better chance of reading them," she said. "Who needs more than three hundred books a year anyway?"

Sweet Spotted Dick, I hope her tongue was planted firmly in her cheek. I cower to think of a world where we only have three hundred books in any given year to pick from.

But her comment made me think of Elwyn Brooks (Andy) White.


         E_b_white

You know the guy. E.B. White, author of Stuart Little and Charlotte’s Web and the redoubtable The Elements of Style, with his buddy William Strunk.

          White_charlotte

But he also wrote a wonderful piece called "Irtnog." An essay that fits nicely into Ms. Chatlist’s  desire for  fewer words to read.


"Along about 1920 it became apparent that more things were being written than people had time to read. That is to say, even if a man spent his entire time reading stories, articles, and news, as they appeared in books, magazines, and pamphlets, he fell behind. This was no fault of the reading public; on the contrary, readers made a real effort to keep pace with writers, and utilized every spare moment during their waking hours. They read while shaving in the morning and while waiting for trains and while riding on trains.

            

               Barbershop1_2


There came to be a kind of tacit agreement among numbers of the reading public that when one person laid down the baton, someone else must pick it up; and so when a customer entered a barbershop, the barber would lay aside the Boston Evening Globe and the customer would pick up Judge; or when a customer appeared in a shoeshining parlor, the bootblack would put away the Racing Form and the customer would open his briefcase and pull out The Sheik. So there was always somebody reading something. Motormen of trolley cars read while they waited on the switch. Errand boys read while walking from the corner of Thirty-ninth and Madison to the corner of Twenty-fifth and Broadway. Subway riders read constantly, even when they were in a crushed, upright position in which nobody could read his own paper but everyone could look over the next man’s shoulder. People passing newsstands would pause for a second to read headlines. Men in the backseats of limousines, northbound on Lafayette Street in the evening, switched on tiny dome lights and read the Wall Street Journal. Women in semi-detached houses joined circulating libraries and read Vachel Lindsay while the baby was taking his nap.

 

  Womanreading

 


There was a tremendous volume of stuff that had to be read.  Writing began to give off all sorts of by-products.  Readers not only had to read the original works of a writer, but they also had to scan what the critics said, and they had to read the advertisements reprinting the favorable criticisms, and they had to read the book chat giving some rather odd piece of information about the writer—such as that he could write only when he had a gingersnap in his mouth. It all took time. Writers gained steadily, and readers lost.

Then along came the Reader’s Digest.

     Readersdigest

That was a wonderful idea.  It digested everything that was being written in leading magazines, and put new hope in the hearts of readers. Here, everybody thought, was the answer to the problem. Readers, badly discouraged by the rate they had been losing ground, took courage and set out once more to keep abreast of everything that was being written in the world. For a while they seemed to hold their own. But soon other digests and short cuts appeared, like Time, and The Best Short Stories of 1927, and the new Five-Foot shelf, and Wells’ Outline of History, and Newsweek, and Fiction Parade. By 1939 there were one hundred and seventy-three digests, or short cuts, in America, and even if a man read nothing but digests of selected material, and read continuously, he couldn’t keep up. It was obvious that something more concentrated than digests would have to come along to take up the slack.

It did. Someone conceived the idea of digesting the digests.  He brought out a little publication called Pith, no bigger than your thumb. It was a digest of Reader’s Digest, Time, Concise Spicy Tales, and the daily News Summary of the New York Herald Tribune.  Everything was so extremely condensed that a reader could absorb everything that was being published in the world in about forty-five minutes.  It was a tremendous financial success, and of course other publications sprang up, aping it:  one called Core, another called Nub, and a third called Nutshell. Nutshell folded up, because, an expert said, the name was too long; but half a dozen others sprang up to take its place, and for another short period readers enjoyed a breathing spell and managed to stay abreast of writers.  In fact, at one juncture, soon after the appearance of Nub, some person of unsound business tendencies felt that the digest rage had been carried too far and that there would be room in the magazine field for a counterdigest—a publication devoted to restoring literary bulk.


           Stackbooks


He raised some money and issued a huge thing called Amplifo, undigesting the digests. In the second issue the name had been changed to Regurgitans. The third issue never reached the stands. Pith and Core continued to gain, and became so extraordinarily profitable that hundreds of other digests of digests came into being. Again readers felt themselves slipping. Distillate came along, a superdigest which condensed a Hemingway novel to the single word “Bang!” and reduced a long article about the problem of the unruly child to the words “Hit him.”

You would think that with such drastic condensation going on, the situation would have resolved itself and that an adjustment would have been set up between writer and reader. Unfortunately, writers still forged ahead. Digests and superdigests, because of their rich returns, became as numerous as the things digested. It was not until 1960, when a Stevens Tech graduate named Abe Shapiro stepped in with an immense ingenious formula, that a permanent balance was established between writers and readers.  Shapiro was a sort of Einstein.  He had read prodigiously; and as he thought back over all the things that he had ever read, he became convinced that it would be possible to express them in mathematical quintessence. He was positive that he could take everything that was written and published each day, and reduce it to a six-letter word. He worked out a secret formula and began posting daily bulletins, telling his result.  Everything that had been written during the first day of his formula came down to the word “Irtnog.”  The second day, everything reduced to “Efsitz.”

 

 P ([X/n-p] ≤ ∑) + (ƒ x 9.4121) – (π ≠µ) = Efsitz

 

People accepted these mathematical distillations; and strangely enough, or perhaps not strangely at all, people were thoroughly satisfied—which would lead one to believe that what readers really craved was not so much the contents of the books, magazines, and papers as the assurance that they were not missing anything. Shapiro found that his bulletin board was inadequate, so he made a deal with a printer and issued a handbill at five o’clock every afternoon, giving the Word of the Day. It caught hold instantly.

The effect on the populace was salutary. Readers, once they felt confident that they had one-hundred-per-cent coverage, were able to discard the unnatural habit of focusing their eyes on words every instant. Freed of the exhausting consequences of their hopeless race against writers, they found their health returning, along with a certain tranquility and a more poised way of living. There was a marked decrease in stomach ulcers, which, doctors said, had been the result of allowing the eye to jump nervously from one newspaper headline to another after a heavy meal. With the dwindling of reading, writing fell off. Forests, which had been plundered for newsprint, grew tall again; droughts were unheard of; and people dwelt in slow comfort, in a green world."


    Greenworld


Thank goodness we’ve not yet reached the point of Irtnog. Nor Efsitz.

But if Nutshell was too long a word for a digest … if abridged audio books sell better than unabridged … and if we already have an entire television network called E! … can a digest called simply "!" be far behind?

My challenge for readers today: In the spirit of E.B. White’s faux-paean to digests, give me a three-words-or-less summary of any book you want.

Example: A Tale of Two Cities = "Off with têtes."

 

(And thanks to Secret Admirer Tom, for producing a pristine copy of Irtnog for today’s blog.)

 

Why We Do It: Murderati at One Year

by Pari Noskin Taichert

A couple of weeks ago, I wanted to cry. I’d just learned that two valued members of Murderati planned to leave. This made me so sad.

After almost a year of hard work, I started to question blogging.

Believe me, it takes mucho energy to come up with engaging topics, to write and rewrite, to commit to this process whether or not the blog is busy that day. It’s also a challenge to participate in a group endeavor; democracy isn’t for wimps.

Yet week after week, we continue composing posts that disappear into the blogosphere. We work through disagreements in order to bring all of our voices to seen and unseen readers. We support each other.

What’s the return on this investment?
Anyone who thinks it’ll translate into hefty book sales, or contracts granted, is deluded.

So why do we do it?

P1010036Today, when you read this, I’ll probably be in my kitchen making chicken soup (the picture to the left is of the first batch of matzoh balls I made last Sunday), stirring the brisket, testing the meringues, placing roasted eggs on the Seder plates. I’ve been preparing for this traditional celebration for a little more than a week — menu-planning, cooking, cleaning, de-cluttering, struggling to find the right balance between religious observance and social commentary for our family and 15 guests.

Why do I do it?

Would you belive the reasons for blogging and having a large Seder are the same?

I do it to share, to nurture a sense of community, to participate in a larger conversation about the world.

I do it for love . . .

Frankly, I think all of us at Murderati do. (Hey, guys, correct me if I’m wrong.)

This week and next, you’ll meet our newest Murderati members. I’m delighted to announce the updated schedule. Please join me in welcoming:

Ken Bruen — He’ll alternate Tuesday posts with Louise Ure.

Robert Gregory Browne and J.D. Rhoades — They’ll alternate Wednesday posts.

Toni Causey –She’ll be one of our main guest bloggers, just like Naomi Hirahara.

Our first year passed in the blink of an eye. I’m humbled and grateful for the many fine people who’ve participated here — both as writers and readers (including lurkers). Our second year promises to be at least as thought-provoking.

It’s been such an honor to share our world with you. I hope you’ll continue sharing yours with all of us.

Thank you,

Pari

How to Make a Fan

Rusty_2  By Mike MacLean

In one day, three writers made an instant fan for life–J.A. Konrath, Thomas O’Callaghan, and Murderati’s own Paul Guyot.

How did they do it?  They each sent an email with a few words of encouragement.  That’s it.  One little email and they now have a life-long fan.

I’d been writing stories online for a while, yet hadn’t received much in the way of recognition.  Dave White once sent a note, but for the most part encouragement was a far off speck on the horizon.  Then last year I was lucky enough to have stories posted at both Thrilling Detective, and Demolition.  Although I’d never met them, Konrath, O’Callaghan, and Guyot each wrote me.  Nothing major, just a few kind words.  The impact was tremendous.

Bonethief200 Hearing that professional writers had not only read but enjoyed my work meant the world to me.  It made me feel like all those hours behind the keyboard might actually payoff, that someday I could possibly carve out a little place for myself in publishing.

A few short emails, that’s all it took.

Even before hearing from these guys, I’d made it a habit to contact webzine writers when I enjoyed their stories.  I haven’t been doing that lately.  In the immortal words of Ferris Bueller, "Life comes at you pretty fast," and I’ve been busy.  But now, I’m vowing to make time for zine writers again.  And I strongly suggest anyone reading this should do the same.  Let me illustrate why with two points. Whenonemandies_124_2

1.  It will make you feel good giving a struggling writer some encouragement.

2.  Your time reading the story and sending a short note might pay off in book sales.  For example, I’ve bought Konrath’s books, I’ve bought O’Callaghan’s, and I’ll be the first in line to buy Guyot’s and White’s.  Also, I’ve just mentioned each of these guys in a blog which is read by other people who might now go out and buy their books.

So when you’ve finished with this, cruise over to one of the fine sites below and browse a few stories.  I  guarantee you’ll find one you like.  Then track down the author and tell him so.  If you have time, come back and mention the story you read in the comments page so others can check it out too.

Thrilling Detective

Demolition

Thug Lit

Hardluck Stories

Spinetingler

Muzzle Flash

Mouth Full of Bullets

Shred of Evidence

(If I missed anyone, I apologize)

And while you’re at it, drop the editors a note.  These people put blood, sweat, tears, and cash into their zines, often with little appreciation, all to give new writers a voice.  I for one would like to thank each and every one of them.

         

The Horror….

by Alex

I’m in Toronto this weekend for the World Horror Convention.   So is
Simon, but he threatened me under pain of death and torture not to talk
about what HE’s been doing.

(Come to think of it, threats of pain and torture are probably de rigeur at a horror con anyway, so perhaps I’ll just spill.)

Toronto is a beautiful city.   Huge.   I had no idea.   We’re right
downtown attached to the Eaton Center, a mall that is so big that even
five minutes inside is too overwhelming – I’d rather walk around it. 
The interesting thing is that the mall and the hotel have grown up
around a very Gothic 1847 church.   I have stained glass right outside
my hotel window.   It sets a cool mood for all of this.    I went
inside yesterday and it seems homeless people just live there – there
were a good dozen people asleep in different pews and chairs. 
Somewhat like the courtyard scene in Sleeping Beauty after the whole
kingdom has been put to sleep.

There are other enormous churches every block or two, interspersed with
all the skyscrapers..   It’s also surprisingly warm (I was prepared for
sub zero and the lakes were still quite frozen flying in, so the
walking temperature is a welcolme surprise.

World Horror is a professional con, which means you’re not running into
The Grim Reaper and various Pinheads and the two little girls from THE
SHINING walking around as at fan conferences, which I kind of miss. 
But it’s been a great con so far.   Lots of Brits – I finally got to
meet Ramsey Campbell and Tim Lebbon, two writers I’ve been a fan of for
ages (well, Ramsey for ages, Tim for years).   It’s always the greatest
pleasure to hang with F. Paul Wilson and Tom Monteleone and David
Morrell – not just three of the most charming men on the planet, but
like a constant master class in – mastery.   Joe Landsdale is here and
is my new favorite icon (all these guys could just as easily have been
actors as writers – it’s constatnly amazing to me how multitalented
authors are).

I had a fabulous day yesterday signing with Sarah Langan, who is also
up for a Stoker for First Novel – and we did our own mini-drop in
bookstore tour yesterday (both sleepless and like the walking dead, but
that made for some hilarious and appropriately Twilight Zone moments).

And I’ve been completely adopted by a group of WHC professionals –
Eunice Magill, Maurice Broaddus, Chesya Burke, Michelle Wilson and
Lucien Soulban, who are making everything very easy and comfortable.

Panels all day today and then the awards ceremony at night.    Lots of
interesting programming on crossing genres so I really will try to
update some of the highlights during the day today but of course have
had maddening Internet access.

And of course, a full report on Simon.   You’re just never going to believe it.    😉

How Do You Write A Novel?

JT Ellison

It’s a good question, isn’t it? One I’ve been asked more times than I can count, sometimes with genuine curiosity, sometimes with a sneering edge of "I can do that, you’re nothing special," sometimes with an air of absolute incredulity from a reader who gets it. More often than not, and remember, I’m talking about people who don’t read regularly, I get asked these questions with a sense of dismissal.

There is an overwhelming misapprehension among laypeople about publishing in general, about writing, about the realities writers face. People assume that you dash off one hundred pages and a publishing house says cool, we’re going to publish your book, and two weeks later it’s on the shelf. Oh, that would be nice, wouldn’t it?

So the reality — the years of work, blood, sweat and tears that go into a novel, the marketing and promotion, the Internet presence prior to landing an agent, or a publisher — all that is lost on people who think books grow from the grocery shelves like so much hamburger or broccoli.

But how do you write a novel? How do you make the jump from fiddling with words, putting them in order, maybe even writing some poetry or short stories, to building a salable story, developing characters and plots, writing hundreds of pages of coherent prose that will be worthy of a cover?

I’ve been thinking about this lately. (As usual, I’ve been exposed to something new and I’m making sense of it, in my way.) The first was Stephen King’s ON WRITING, so highly recommended by Mr. Guyot some weeks back. The second was a comment made by Julia Spencer-Fleming. Both of these fantastic authors obviously have THE SECRET figured out, and do a great job explaining it.

Julia was speaking to our local chapter of Sisters in Crime and was being grilled by the audience, made up of mostly writers that night. The inevitable question of where do you get your ideas was put forth, and I settled back, fascinated, as I always am, to hear the answer. No doubt you’ve noticed that no two authors can give you the same answer. Some dream, some plot, some are struck by things they see on their morning walk, some just have wild, creative minds. It wasn’t the idea answer that captured my attention, it was what she followed with. The ooga-ooga.

We all have ideas. We all have the facilities to turn those ideas into stories. But HOW do we do it? Yes, yes, we sit at the computer and write them down. We’re disciplined, and work hard. We know the rules, we understand the grammar and punctuation, know how to spell and use dialogue tags. But can we really explain HOW we turn that knowledge into a novel?

Julia calls it the ooga-ooga. I had a vision of cannibals standing over a cauldron, sharpened bones piercing their lips, tossing various bits of vegetable matter into the stew, a dash of pepper, a pinch of salt — Ooga-Ooga, dinner’s ready. And I felt every constraint I’ve ever been saddled with disappear. Oh, you mean we’re allowed to admit that there might be an element of writing we can’t explain? That it’s not wrong to look at our extraordinary ability to manipulate words as a gift? As Julia pointed out, could Beethoven explain how the notes came together in his head? 

I was trying to explain this to a new friend at a party this past weekend. At a loss and knowing ooga-ooga wasn’t going to cut it, I fell back on another analogy I’ve used. Do you cook from a recipe or from scratch? Have you ever watched a cook who uses recipes as a suggested guideline? They season to taste. They toss in the pepper and salt, oregano and onion, garlic and basil, stir, add, taste, stir, add, taste until their face takes on that triumphant glow. It’s perfect. Can they tell you what ingredients to use? Yes. Can they tell you how just one extra dash of oregano and a pinch of salt makes it perfect? Well, yes, they can tell you, but you need to taste the finished product to understand.

That is how I write a novel. I build the story with words, toss in the spices, and season it to taste. I can’t necessarily explain HOW that happens, but I know when it’s ready to be read, just as a master chef knows when it’s time to turn off the heat and serve their dish.

In ON WRITING, King says:

"At its most basic we are only discussing a learned skill, but do we not agree that sometimes the most basic skills can create things far beyond our expectations? We are talking about tools and carpentry, about words and style . . . but as we move along, you’d do well to remember that we’re also talking about magic."

Magic. Ooga-Ooga. Call it what you will.

King also gave permission to do all the reading and writing my little heart desires. Of late, I’ve been up to my ears in the Internet — promotion, web sites, groups blogging, reading blogs, reading list serves, keeping up with sales and tracking books, MySpace and now Crimespace — and I feel like my writing, and reading, are suffering because of it. This break couldn’t have come at a better time. Last year, when I was in heavy book mode, I shut off my lists, didn’t play on email, and got the work done. I was happy when hubby got home from work because I’d accomplished so much each day. I’m about to go into that mode again. So if you don’t see me around as much, it’s nothing personal. I’ll be doing my blog here, but the rest of the time I’ll be focused on my writing, and catching up on reading. That’s how I write a novel. With a little ooga-ooga on the side.

Wine of the Week: Let’s do a 2003 Clos de L’Obac, a nice Spanish blend of granacha and cabernet sauvignon, with some syrah, merlot and carinena. Yum!