Author Archives: Murderati


Oh Baby!

I apologize for not participating in the blog discussions this week.  But I assure you I have a good reason…

Introducing, CHLOE CHAMPAGNE MACLEAN!!!

Born Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Chloe_1_57 pounds 15 ounces

20.5 inches

10 fingers, 10 toes

Perfect!

Both mom and baby are doing just fine.

This is the extent of my blog this week.  I could try to wax poetic on the nature of new life and writing, but I’ve got dirty diapers to deal with.  Besides, that little face says it all.

In other News

The great Poisoned Pen in Scottsdale along with MWA SoCal are pleased to present Barbara Peters in Conversation.  Peters, a publisher, editor, and bookseller, will speak on "Current Trends in the Book Biz and What Writers Ought to Know About Them."

When:             Monday, April 16 5pm

Where:            The Poisoned Pen

                        4014 N Goldwater Blvd. Suite 101

                        Scottsdale, AZ

But wait, there’s more.

While the event at Poisoned Pen is open to the public, MWA members are invited to get together afterwards at a nearby watering hole for cocktails and conversation.

Branded

by Alex

It sure is Spring.   That brilliant green grass, the burgeoning blossoms, explosions of color, those maddeningly delicious fragrances wafting in the breeze…

Beautiful.   Uplifting.   Rejuvenating.

Here’s a thought.  As soon as I turn in my book, I’m going to write something happy.  A love story.  A whimsical comedy.   Something light.  Something lovely.

Right.

I can already hear the stereophonic bicoastal hysterics of my agents and publishers…

Sigh.

No, It’s not a real thought.  Well, all right, it was a real thought, but a very fleeting thought.   

It’s a question of "brand".  I know my brand.  I don’t even have my second novel out yet and I don‘t just know my brand – I work my brand.  I work the hell out of my brand.  I write spooky, sexy, dark and eerie.  There might be some uplift going on there as well, but never at the expense of thrills.

And even though I’m having this momentary longing to do something not QUITE so dark next time (that or run away to a tropical island and never write again…) dark is not just my brand, it’s who I am.  It’s a brand in a much more metaphysical sense – it’s a brand on my character, on my soul.

I have a writer friend who is always saying that I should write my OWN story – like autobiographically.  I keep telling her that what I write IS my own story.  This is how I see things.

Here’s a perfect example.  I’m on deadline and have been housebound for what seems like months, but my next characters have already come to me.  Physically.   Like, on the sidewalk outside the window where I work.   I see these four kids every day now, two or three times a day, walking by, always together,  a strange collection.  A very short, slim, animated black girl.  A very large redhaired white girl with doughy skin and flat eyes.  A small, wiry black boy with a loud laugh.  A talk, dark-haired, spacy white boy. 

They are not your normal teenagers.  They are a pack.  They are always together.  They even move together – walking in a clump, closer than ordinary people stand to each other   It is very strange to see four people so near to each other and so synchronized.  They don’t seem dangerous as in violent, but dangerous nonetheless.  Though they chatter and caper like teenagers, there is a heaviness about them.  They stick together for protection, and it’s not hard to imagine what they need protection from, or why they’re on the street.

I have become obsessed with them.  I think they are homeless and now that it’s getting warm they have come out from some shelter and are sleeping under the railway bridge down the street.  But they’re clean, and they’re not obviously stoned.  What they are is feral.

They have noticed me, too, behind my window – at least one of them has – the redhaired girl.  She was as startled to see me in the local grocery store as I was to see her, because, you see, I was thinking about them at the very moment that they appeared around the end of the aisle.  They were shoplifting, I’m sure, tucking pizzas and cokes into their oversized jackets.  It was overwhelmingly odd to see them in the store.  It was even odder to come home from the store and see them walking on the sidewalk past my window the second I walked into the house.  I left the store before them and I have a car.  They could not possibly have beaten me home.

Definitely not the stuff of romantic comedy.

Zombies, revenants,  creatures of the night….  perhaps.  We’ll see. It’s inevitable.

You see, I AM writing my own story.

I’m branded.

Are you?

Sip or Swallow?

JT Ellison

How do you read?

Are you a gulper, must read in large chunks of time, one book at a time type, or can you be just as happy with a simple sips from several sources, reading several books at once?

Do you read everyday?

Do you stick with a single genre and known commodity authors, or are you seduced by variety?

Why do I ask? Because I’m seeing some interesting trends, or non-trends in the publishing industry, and I’m curious to see how other readers approach their tasks. I’m a gulper. I hate being torn away from a book. Once I’ve committed the time to an author, I want to give them my undivided attention, take the journey with them, see how they "do it," for lack of a better term.

And I’d like to think I’m varied in my choices, though I do have a few authors that I’m faithful to regardless.

For a while there I was having a difficult time enjoying anything I read. It wasn’t that I was reading poor material, on the contrary, I was on a roll with some of the big award winning names. I was analyzing their work. It’s the bane of any writer, the inability to separate your style from the story of others. Oh, I wouldn’t have used that word, or I wouldn’t have given that clue there. If it were mine, I would have. . .

Would of, should of, could of. What??? Egads, what was I thinking? Where did THAT touch of arrogance come from? How in the world could I think like this? That I would do it differently? Then it would be my book. And that wasn’t what I wanted at all. Epiphany time. It didn’t matter what I would do. I needed to respect they way the author had done it. Amazing the freedom that tidbit gave.

Which made me wonder about the pure readers, those who don’t spend half their day writing their own books. How do you read? Are you a deconstructionist, like me, or do you allow the story to unfold, trusting the author to keep you on the right track? What drives you to unparalleled paroxysms of delight?

And here’s where I’m going with all these questions.

I noticed something very interesting the other day at a Steve Berry signing here in Nashville. I go to as many of the signings as I can, especially the big-name authors. I’ve been lucky enough to see John Connolly, Michael Connelly, Steve Berry, Tasha Alexander, Julia Spencer-Fleming, Diana Gabaldon and trust me, the upcoming visit of Lee Child has me in my own paroxysms of delight. But what fascinated me is that the attendees are different for each author. You’d think that people who like Lee Child would like Michael Connelly would like Steve Berry, right? Apparently not in Nashville. Each "name" seems to have their own following, and there are maybe four or five people who cross over into each.

Why the disparity? I’d love to know the answer to that. If you have any ideas, please chime in. I guess I’m naive in thinking that mystery readers like thrillers, and thriller readers like mysteries, but perhaps I’m wrong, and never the twain shall meet. Is this phenomenon native to Nashville?

A housekeeping note: I’m going to be gone for the next two Fridays. The lovely and talented Naomi Hirahara will be blogging in my stead while I traipse through Italy. This is the first real vacation I’ve taken since the writing journey began three years ago. I won’t be taking my laptop, will assiduously avoid Internet cafes, and promise to come back with a slew of new wine selections and a renewed sense of verve. I’ll miss you.

In the meantime:

"2007 Agatha Nominee Julia Spencer-Fleming (ALL MORTAL FLESH) interviews
fellow nominees Earlene Fowler, Jacqueline Winspear, Nancy Pickard and
L.C. Hayden, discussing their lives, books and craft in a delightful
series of interviews."

  • The brilliant, witty and always insightful Tasha Alexander has new fare! Her second novel of historical suspense, A POISONED SEASON, went on sale Tuesday. Get a copy today, you won’t be disappointed!

Arrivederci, i miei amici!

Wine of the Week: As the first part of the trip will be in the Piedmont region, I’m going to start with a Barbera, then have a Barolo, and maybe a touch of Asti toward the end of day one and will report back with brand names… I’m going to refuse the homemade lemon grappa this time. Non molto bene.

 

Gone Fishin’

Ah, the air smells fresher.  Colors are more vibrant.  Everything is good with the world and I am happy.
 
The reason for my good spirits is that I completed my next book, Paying the Piper, and turned it in on deadline.  Dorchester has it and they’re happy and we’re holding hands as we walk into the sunset.
 
I like completing a book, because I can be me again.  As the deadline looms, I start to discard extraneous life items like weight from a sinking balloon. Such things as regular meals, entertainment, exercise, and tidying up after myself have gone by the wayside.  I’ve put on 10lbs over the last few months.  Nothing else matters except for finishing the book.  Now that it’s in the bag, I can see what’s been going on in the world.  I can read for pleasure, see a movie, walk my dog—and Julie says tidy my damn room.  She has a point there.  There are over 2000 sheets of paper in various piles stacked haphazardly around my office. This week it’s my intention to clear up the house and weed the garden.  Then get back to the home improvement projects I have planned which include a kitchen and two bathrooms.
 
I’m particularly happy to be able to draw a line under Paying the Piper.  The book was on a fast track so I didn’t have a lot of time to write it.  To compound the pressure, there was a lot of messy life stuff that got in the way, not to mention having to promote Accidents Waiting to Happen.  So hand on heart, the last six months have been a pain.  But I’m not complaining.  This is what I want to do with my life and I signed on knowing it would be tough.  It was just a little tougher this time around.  But I did it.  Well done me.
 
I finished the book Sunday and I haven’t thought of anything creative since then—except for my impending tax return which is due at the end of the week.  I feel weird not writing anything.  Guilty even.  It’s not right that there isn’t a keyboard attached to my fingertips.  I’m in a vacuum—and I don’t like it.  But I have to stay strong.  I promised myself a little break and I’m going to have one.  I’m a little worried about Julie though.  She said, “I don’t have anything to read.  What am I going to do?”  The withdrawal hit her after a day or two.  She’s jonesing for a story.  By the end of the week, she’ll be pressing herself up against me and saying, “Got any pages for me, baby?  Mamma needs some eye candy.”
 
“But I don’t have anything,” I’ll say.
 
“Don’t be like that,” she’ll reply.  “Julie knows you’ve got something tucked away.  Just a few pages will get me through.  A synopsis will do.  I know you have a short story tucked away somewhere.  You’ve always got a short story.  Give it up, baby.  Julie will make it worth your while.”
 
I think Julie has a problem…
 
I was planning to take a month off, but as usual, it ain’t gonna work out that way.  I already have another book project due before the end of the year in addition to my next novel project.  So my resolution to be good to myself in 2007 has been put back a year.  So my month’s vacation has been reduced to this week—from which I won’t budge.  It’s my birthday on Saturday.  This week is all about me time.  That’s final.  Unless something falls into my lap between now and Sunday.
 
So if you’re reading this, I’m not here.  I’ve gone fishin’ with Royston.  We could both do with the exercise.
 
Yours elsewhere,
Simon Wood

Somebody’s Goin’ to Emergency, Somebody’s Goin’ To Jail

Friends and neighbors, it’s great to
be here at Murderati, Thanks to the gang
for inviting me, even though I confess to being more than a little intimidated,
being surrounded by all this talent.

I mean, dear Lord, I have to try and follow Bruen? Thanks just oodles, guys.

Those of you who know me know that I
also have my own solo blog, What Fresh Hell is This? My tens of fans from that
effort know that I tend to engage in a lot of discussion there on politics and
society, and by "discussion" I mean "unhinged ranting."
Never fear, however, I’ll be saving the political stuff for there, and I’ll try
to keep my ranting here as hinged as possible. 

Now having just disclaimed any
intention to do political and social commentary here, I will now discuss
political and social commentary, at least as it pertains to crime fiction. 

 I recall a panel I once did at the Cape Fear Crime Festival
with the brilliant  Michele Martinez
during which she talked about one of the attractions of crime fiction, namely
that it provides us with stories in which the bad guys are caught, justice is
done, and balance is restored to society. I, on the other hand, pointed out
that I tend to like (and to write) stories in a more minor key,  in which corruption and evil exist from the
top of society to the bottom and things are coming apart at the seams. Balance
may be restored in stories like that, but more likely not, at least not without
terrible cost. 

But if you break it down to its most basic level, we crime writers, from
creators of the darkest noir to the
fluffiest cat mystery, write about the same thing: a world that’s gone out of whack, a
world where, as Shakespeare said, “the
time is out of joint,” or, to quote a more contemporary poet, “somebody’s goin’
to Emergency, somebody’s goin’ to jail.”  And when you write about a world out of whack,
it’s very easy to begin putting in your own opinion as to how and why it got
that way. It’s a temptation to want to use a particular book to grind a
particular axe. And that’s okay, if it’s done right. Some of the best crime
writers, like Ian Rankin, weave their Big Idea into the fabric of the
story so deftly that you don’t even realize a point Is being made until the
book’s over, and you go, “yeah, that’s right.” . Others…well, not so much. Some writers beat you over the head with
their particular version of the Big Stick O’ Commentary until you cry “Uncle” and toss the book aside.

Now, in person,   I’m a positive kind of guy. In addition, I
have a powerful aversion to being  punched in the mouth or having a
drink thrown on me by a disgruntled colleague. So let’s talk about who does it
right. Who, in your opinion, can not only make a point about society, including but not limited to a
political one, but can  make you like it? 

 

 

The Writer from the Writing

by Ken Bruen

Should writers live up to the expectations of their readers, should e.g. Lee Child be more Reacher in his appearances? Or Barry Eisler be more like Rain . . . Scratch that, Barry pretty much is .

My point, which I’ll eventually make, is readers get a picture of the author from what they’ve read, so is it better if they never actually get to meet the writer . . . because by Christ, most of the time, they are in for a shock.

If you write about psychos and convincingly, when your readers meet a mild gentle soul . . . are they going to go, Hello?

For a long time, readers and reviewers believed that Jim Sallis was black; he couldn’t have written such a compelling, convincing character as Lou Griffin if he were white! Jason Starr has written some of the most noir characters to come down the pike since Charles Willeford, and a few weeks back, taking his daughter to school, he got talking to one of the other dads and told him he was a noir writer. The man went, "You!"

Jim O. Born writes of the homicide squad and so believably that he won the major award last week . . . congrats, Jim. And he is just the funniest sweetest guy till you see him demonstrate weapons and talk about his daily job . . . as a cop.

Vicki Hendricks writes the sleaziest down in the gutter noir that I’ve had people say to me, "That can’t be a woman?"
And I tell them she is a lecturer and they go, "Not the same person."

Years ago, Val McDermott and I were together at a convention in Germany and as we huddled over a brew, Val said, "See, the looks?"

I did.

She added, "They figure, two hardboiled mystery writers, discussing mystery and mayhem when we’re actually exchanging photos of our kids!"

I write about the lowest of the low, the losers, the alienated, the seriously deranged and when my readers meet me, they always ask, "Are you sure you’re Bruen?"

I think so, most days anyway.

The best example of this was two years ago when I went to Dublin to meet a Sunday Times journalist, and we agreed to meet in The Shelbourne. The hotel closed a week later but the two events are not connected.

Are they?

I was early and saw a lady breeze in, all biz, power dressing, well, I mean she was English and thought that shite still mattered and was glancing furiously at her watch. I approached and asked if she was looking for Ken Bruen.

"Yes."

She gritted and, "He’s late."

When I told her I was, am . . . the person, she stared at me in total wonderment and said, "But you’ve manners?"

She’d read me books, and works, C.V. and expected a branded hell’s angel. I was a sad bitter blow.

We did the interview and she kept snapping, "Don’t do that irony on me!"

You’ll gather that we didn’t bond, become email buddies and go on to write a book together.

No.

When the article appeared, the heading was . . . Benign Thug.

I can certainly be thuggish but benign . . . I’m working on it.

Being Catty

by Pari Noskin Taichert

P1010029 Lately, I’ve been marveling at how chic it is to scoff at kittycats. There’s this overarching bias in our crime fiction community that equates felines with frippery. It’s a kind of odd snobbery, snuggly and warm as a winter blanket, but woven with disdain.

If a mystery contains a cat — and that cat has even a small role — it’s a hairball in the world of literature.

Meow.

And yet, sometimes, when I’m imbibing my second shot of scotch, I raise a glass to the queen of cat mysteries . . . Lillian Jackson Braun. Her dozens of CAT WHO books have sold millions of copies for years. She has a rabid fan base that spans the globe.

Obviously, all of those readers are wrong.
Right?

Cat mysteries denigrate the important work we’re trying to do in the crime fiction genre.
Don’t they?

It’s interesting that at the same time this bias exists, you can go to a community-connection site like Crimespace and find many people who are using cats as avatars (representations of themselves).

What gives?

Why is it cool to dis fictional felines?

Let me tell you a brief story . . .

A little more than a decade ago, I was pregnant — sick, hostile and of a murderous mind. That’s when I discovered the curative powers of traditional mysteries, of fun and fast reads. Only these could momentarily soothe my nausea and frayed nerves. Braun, Grafton and a score of other authors became my sanity.

Alas, one day the CAT WHO series stopped working for me. I got angry. If Braun could slam out so many books and sell so well, why couldn’t I? Hell, I was a better writer than she was! (DANGER! DANGER! DANGER!)

P1010030 It’s so easy to compare ourselves with other writers, isn’t it? Many of us tumble into jealousy or holier-than-thou attitudes that only serve to make us miserable, wet little kittens — the kind with stinky fur and runny eyes.

I know I suffered in a major way because of these attitudes. When Braun’s books lost their magic for me, I wanted something to blame. The cats were an easy target.

. . . So, I understand some of the current snickering.

But guess what? I ended up putting a cat into my New Mexico series. This was — and is — an absolute tip of the hat to Braun. Without the disappointment I felt with that book long ago, I might never have had the impetus to put my butt in a chair and write the first manuscript. I might not have stuck through the failure of that attempt, and the one after that, before finally selling a work.

You see, I think it’s seductive to feel superior. Sometimes it can generate wonderful action. More often, it deprives us.

I don’t write cat mysteries, but I don’t mock them either. In my series, Leo does have a role in my protag’s life. Anyone who has had a pet to love, knows how important an animal can be to maintaining a sense of stability when the world seems rocky and mean.

What I find intriguing is that cats get bigger play, bigger attention, in the excuse to neglect a sector of books.

Why cats?

Why not goldfish
or cigarette smokers
or men who can’t maintain healthy relationships?

What’s up with that?

P1010032

Balance

Mike MacLean

My wife is nine months pregnant, due to give birth any day now.  While we have the usual doubts about parenting, we’re excited and happy for this new chapter in our life.

I have only one real fear.  What will happen to my writing?

As it is, my time is spread thin.  Between the day job, my martial arts studies, quality time with the wife, and the blog, my fiction sometimes gets pushed to the side.  And now, there’s going to be a little one in my life-a beautiful, crying, crapping, burping little one.  Just one more demand on my time.

I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t concerned.  After all, writing doesn’t pay the bills right now.  Writing isn’t going to change a diaper.  Writing isn’t going to hug my wife.

So where does writing fit in the grand scheme of things?  How important is it?

I remember a 60 Minutes interview with a famous playwright whose name now escapes me.  When asked about the balancing act between his family and his work, the playwright responded, "Art comes first… Always."

While I don’t agree, I understand the sentiment.  To give up on writing, would be giving up on a dream.  Losing hold of it would mean losing a piece of myself.  That’s a short road to bitterness.

How good a husband will I be if I’m unhappy?  How good a father?

Putting writing aside simply isn’t an option.  In fact, I feel more and more that I must make it a priority.  The question becomes, where do I find the time?

So I’m reaching out to you once again murder fans.  To the writers out there, especially those with day jobs, how do you keep the balance?  How do you keep writing a priority when life gets in the way?

Happy Easter and enjoy the ham.

Mike MacLean

Masters of the Craft (World Horror, Part II)

by Alex

Writing conventions are always invaluable on so many levels it’s hard to quantify.  But there’s often, or maybe always, one particular thing that happens that is worth the whole cost and effort of attending – that may actually cause a paradigm shift in the way you approach your writing and/or your career.

I was at the World Horror Convention in Toronto last weekend and for me that life-altering event was the “Masters of the Craft” panel, with F. Paul Wilson, Ramsey Campbell, Gahan Wilson, Joe Lansdale, Robert Sawyer and David Morrell.

It’s always wonderful to see Paul, Ramsey, and David, who have not just been inspirations, but also extremely generous and supportive mentors (and in the case of Paul and David, bandmates…)   But the combination of these author/artists in conversation together was truly transcendent.

It’s possibly impossible to distill a panel like that into anything useful for people who weren’t actually there, but I’m going to try to pass on the highlights anyway because I was so struck by the synergy of what these guys were saying about what it takes to make the kind of lasting career they all have.

Artist of the Macabre Gahan Wilson was so charming and funny and earnest when he went off on this rant: “When you start you have to have a mad conviction that you’re going to succeed.   It has nothing to do with logic because the chance of succeeding in any art is hopeless.   And you have to love it, be absolutely crazy about it.  Don’t do it unless you’re nuts.”

Lansdale seconded him (and you must imagine this in a thick West Texas drawl):  “You’ve got to be obsessed with it at first.   It’s like being in love – at first you never get out of bed – but after a few years you find you’re able to do a few basic other things, like take out the garbage once in a while.”

(I think all of us who have been published, or are about to be, know this.  In fact we’re so obsessed we don’t really notice how obsessed we are, and when you finally get to a point that you can lift your head up and look back on what you did to get where you are you’re pretty stunned at how insane it all seems.   Thank God we don’t seem to notice when we’re actually doing it, and thank God we don’t realize how long it’s going to take when we start out, or I don’t think there would be any books published, ever.)

Then there was this:

“Writing is like a parasite.   It never quits.    It’s wearing.   The wires are always firing and you don’t get to rest like other people.”
— Joe Lansdale

I can’t tell you how good it feels to hear that from people.   I never tire of hearing it.   It makes me feel not so completely freakish.   Or maybe I’m just clinging to that thought in order to justify acting like a completely insane person.

Gahan Wilson had another reason for never allowing himself to turn  off:

“Some nights you wake up all of a sudden and God is in the room and telling you what your story needs and you better write it down,  or God will get pissed and go away.”

The panel spent a lot of time talking about what makes a breakout success.   Joe Lansdale said:   “It’s about voice and capturing what real human beings think about.   I’ve read all the clever stories and can pretty much guess an entire story from the first chapter, so what keeps me reading is the voice, the style.”     He went on to say that Stephen King was the first author he read who wrote in the voice of their (Joe’s and King’s) generation – the voice of the Sixties, with all the asides and a particular kind of stream of consciousness and incorporating so many references to music and popular culture.   I’d never heard it put exactly that way before, but it made absolute and total sense.

Paul Wilson agreed, but added there was also a certain element of luck involved.   “The right story at the right time will hit in a way that can make a career for life.” He referenced his own THE KEEP as an unpredictable success that made his career.

All the authors talked about how unnerving it was to them that so many people they started out with at the same level of writing just dropped off along the way.   Lansdale said,  “This is not a romantic profession.  It’s more like boxing.  You get knocked down and what keeps you in the game is that you keep getting back up.”

David Morrell warned,   “Don’t chase the market.   It will never work.   It’s better to be a first rate version of yourself than a second rate version of anyone else."

And Paul Wilson said the most important thing is – “You have to write what you love to read.”  

The darkest moment of the panel for me was when Ramsey Campbell and Joe Lansdale both said bluntly – “No wife, no career.”   Obviously that’s not going to happen, so I’m ignoring it.

But the most important moment of the panel for me was when the authors were talking about genre, and crossing genres, and Joe Lansdale swept all of that aside impatiently and said:

“Real authors create their own genre.   Stephen King is his own genre.   You have to throw out your conceptions of genre and develop a voice and an honesty about the human condition that becomes its own genre.”

Now THAT – is a career-defining concept. 

I’m a genre author and a cross-genre author but I do think it’s true – that my favorite authors, the authors I read over and over again –  King, Shirley Jackson, Paul Wilson,  Daphne Du Maurier, Ira Levin, Anne Rice, the Brontes… really are genres unto themselves.     And this may be one of Gahan Wilson’s mad convictions that have nothing to do with logic, but I believe that (maybe through sheer stubbornness or insanity) I have the possibility of doing that – of being my own genre.

After this weekend I am no longer spending any time thinking about what’s out there or what I’m writing compared to what other people are writing.   I’m just going to write it, whatever the hell IT is.

And now that I’ve had that epiphany I have to say I am exponentially thrilled that we have an author joining us here at Murderati who IS his own genre – the indefinable and incomparable Ken Bruen.   I don’t know if you’d call what he does Irish Noir, or even more specifically Galway Noir, or Benign Thuggery, or simply Bruenesque, but Ken has a style that is impossible to copy, because anyone but the original would immediately sound like a cheap imitation.    There’s just too much pure soul going on in what Ken does to make it copiable (if that’s a word).  If you haven’t read him, never mind commenting today, just run out and get THE GUARDS, to start, and you’ll see what I mean.

That Masters of the Craft panel at World Horror was a career-defining experience for me.   But I’m thinking there are going to be some career-defining experiences right here for more than just me, now that Ken is aboard.

I can’t wait.

One Year Later

JT Ellison

It’s hard to imagine that we’ve been blogging here at Murderati for a year. Thank you to all our readers!

I don’t usually make New Year’s resolutions, and I look at September, the beginning of the school year, as the beginning of my year. Now I have an anniversary in April to celebrate. Fitting, really, the rebirth of the season, new life, new hope. I looked back over my blog entries — 49 essays, 45 wine recommendations, and am struck by the amount of work. I’m very grateful for this forum. It has changed me, as a writer, a reader, a group member, a technorati, a leader and a follower. And any exercise that changes you for the better, as I believe Murderati has done for me, if well worth the hard work, don’t you think?

We’ve all had change in the past year. My life has altered so dramatically, I sometimes need a good pinching to remind myself that it’s real.

Allow me a moment to indulge in where I stood as an author this time last year. I had an agent and a book under my belt that hadn’t sold. I’d just written my first couple of short stories. The mere thought of writing a weekly essay on writing scared me to death. How could I expect anyone to take me seriously when I’d never been published, and was surrounded by all these great writers who had?  I knew virtually no one in the industry outside of a few generous souls who were encouraging me behind the scenes. I’d never even been to a conference when I agreed to come on board. I feel like Murderati took a huge chance on me, and I’ll be forever grateful for the opportunity.

I got my book deal 6 weeks after Murderati’s inception. Would I have gotten the deal if I weren’t with the blog???? I don’t know. Murderati didn’t hurt, I’ll tell you that.

It’s funny, really, when I look back over the past year. It hearkens back to my junior high days of glasses and braces, being much too tall for every boy, finding validation on the basketball court, the volleyball court and in class, but never feeling like I fit. Square peg, round hole. Then we moved, I lost the braces, got contacts, and enjoyed high school. I wasn’t the most popular girl, kind of drifted between all the groups, the jocks (I was a track hound — state discus) the brains (G&T classes) the druggies (LOVED Jethro Tull and Pink Floyd), the punks (desperately wanted to die the hair pink but didn’t have the guts, and Anarchy, Baby!) and the geeks (because really, aren’t we all?) I didn’t have a ton of trauma. It was fine.

But I never totally lost that square peg/round hole feeling. Even when I was happy in my other career, I knew something wasn’t right. When I found myself through my books, I finally understood where I was supposed to be in the grand scheme of life. Square pegs finds finely crafted square hole — or as hubby likes to put it — blind squirrel finds nut, News at 11. It is a bit of a "duh" feeling. I’ve never been so happy as I have this past year.

Murderati has given me a gift bigger than any I’ve ever received. As a few of you may have noticed, I tend to do a bit of introspection through this blog. This weekly analysis session is like lying on the psychiatrist’s couch for me. I get to examine my motivations, delve into the why behind my writing, and more importantly, adhere to a writing schedule. I’ve learned new levels of discipline. Days where the fiction isn’t flowing, I can write four or five blog entries and get myself back in the game. I have a new level of comfort with my own writing, and with the explanations therein. I thank you for allowing me to come into your life each week.

While I wish my blog mates past and present a big Happy Birthday, I leave you, the reader, with this thought. Follow your dreams. You just don’t know where they might lead.

xo,  JT

Wine of the Week: As I wrote this post, my absolute favorite Rachmaninoff, the Piano concerto #2, came on. So to honor the karma, let’s do something different.

And some location specific wine to go with it: Francis Ford Coppola Rosso The wine is divine, and the website a work of art.